ALP: Build Service Git-Packaging Workflow

Meeting Wednesdays at 07:00 UTC in

Attendees

Adrian proposes a 3rd way with a JSON file that lists packages by their git repositories that allows mixing SHA1 and branches to ease creation of test projects.
Report from the source-reviewer interviewing
- Primary requirement: no webui, keep existing review tooling, everything needs to be CLI
- Also sources need to be re-reviewed for each new project submission, unclear if that means review-signatures could be handled in git?
  - Adam explains that the git commit signature for source review would be on a new merge commit
AI review

AI adamm: look at how a git signature policy evaluation could be implemented based on adam’s multi-signature signing approach

AI adrian document existing distribution maintenance in git as a presentation and send it to the slack channel
~~Snbarth: Organize a kick-off workshop with all the people who will work on $topic to start scoping the first/next steps for the prototype~~
- ~~participants: Alberto Planas, Dan Čermák, Bruno Leon, Adrian Schröter, Dirk Müller, Stefan Weiberg~~
~~AI: snbarth setup new workgroup~~
~~Dirk: Organize a kick-off workshop with all the people who will work on $topic to start scoping the first/next steps for the prototype~~
AI: dan+snbart create new pages
~~AI: dirk setup security & monitoring on the gitea instance (currently apparmor profile was added)~~
AI: all: start using the git packaging workflow and identify the quirks
AI: Dan to review documentation on how to use git based packages (https://open-build-service.org/help/manuals/obs-user-guide/cha.obs.scm_bridge.html#sec.obs.obs_scm_bridge))
AI: Adrian and snbarth to see how build status can be reported in the gitea webui for a particular source state

pandoc version 2.19.2