User talk:Pistazienfresser

Welcome

Welcome on my "Discussion" subpage!

You can 'talk' to me here.

Please add new issues with a new headline and maybe with a link to the related article.

If you write me in English I will respond in English. Wenn Du mir auf Deutsch schreibst, werde ich auch auf Deutsch antworten. If you write me in an other language I will try to understand and write back ether in English or in German (make a wish).

Please use your signature with time stamp: use the button above the editing field or use --~~~~ to make something like: --Pistazienfresser 08:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Category:Vocabulary

We have one article that explains acronyms. The other stuff belongs into SDB. There you can have a category SDB:Introductions or something where pages like Gui belong to. Remember, documentation and the like belongs into SDB:.

Hello Hennevogel,

if this is your opinion about the namespace SDB you should do something to change its definition.

And thanks for the example of the sense of redirects for technical terms (including acronyms and their variating writings) above.

Greetings --Pistazienfresser 10:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

P.S.: You do not need to write to me on my discussion page if I wrote on your discussion page - I will add your discussion page (automatically) to my watchlist, will answer there and the discussion could easily be followed.--Pistazienfresser 10:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

---

Booting categories

Hi Pistazienfresser,

Sorry about the Boot categories mess - it seems I haven't seen that there was some discussion ongoing about it. I saw that we had [ [ Category:Boot troubleshooting]] while all other "HOWTOs" categories are named [[ Category:SDB:<topic>]]. I tried to correct it by adding a "SDB" for consistency, and I shortened the name at the same time. Seems I totally failed as I didn't saw the ongoing discussion about the boot category. :/ --Spyhawk 23:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

I think the issue with the SDB Categories should be discussed generally and after that done generally - or left like it is. I do not know a good reason why you should be personally to blame for that (more more than less than users). Your (partly) re-categorisation was logical.

I do not care much about the ways of categorization of booting articles - but I hope the user will find what she or he is looking for.

I recognized that the summery line and the discussion pages are not much used in this wiki - maybe this could be changed a bit as I rate it a openly and project related way of discussion.

Good night/good morning --Pistazienfresser 00:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

RE:Organization etc. category dimension/tree/bush?

Well, I just thought, all Mozilla articles where part of category:application:internet (or at least should be) and some where member off category:Mozilla. So I added all those articles to category:mozilla and made catgory:mozilla member of category:application:internet. I would agree to you opinion if Mozilla is publishing software that is not related to the internet. (eg a text editor or whatever)

Unless, we think of a structure which allows categories per software developers... but this could be quite labor intensive. --Muhlemmer 13:12, 4 October 2010 (MDT)

User:Pistazienfresser page link

me at openSUSE forums returns a 404.

--PatrickDGarvey (talk) 22:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)