Usecase2023
The following is a summary of the use case survey run by openSUSE during the month of October 2023. The full results are listed in the File:Usecase2023.pdf.
Intro Questions: Results
What best describes your use of IT?
Work/business (SQ001) 146 9.24% Home/Hobby (SQ002) 450 28.48% Both (SQ003) 656 41.52% No answer 21 1.33% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43%
Summary
A recent survey provides a breakdown of the use cases of Linux among respondents based on their primary use of IT:
- Work/Business: 9.24% of respondents primarily use Linux for work or business-related purposes.
- Home/Hobby: 28.48% of respondents use Linux for home or hobby activities.
- Both: 41.52% of respondents use Linux for both work/business and home/hobby purposes.
- No answer: 1.33% of respondents did not provide an answer regarding their IT use.
- Not completed or not displayed: 19.43% of respondents' information was not completed or displayed.
The survey also assessed the use of various IT technologies on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use) across different domains:
- Cloud Computing: Most respondents (41.70%) rated their use of Linux for cloud computing as 1 (little use), while a significant portion (13.51%) rated it as 5 (primary use).
- Containerization: 34.68% rated their use of containerization as 1 (little use), and 13.84% rated it as 5 (primary use).
- Configuration Management: 30.53% rated their use of configuration management as 1 (little use), and 27.17% rated it as 5 (primary use).
- Desktop Computing: 81.22% of respondents primarily use Linux for desktop computing (rated 5), while only a small portion (3.27%) rated it as 1 (little use).
- Server Infrastructure: 26.53% rated their use of Linux for server infrastructure as 1 (little use), and 29.95% rated it as 1 (little use).
- Serverless Computing: 64.34% primarily use Linux for serverless computing (rated 5), while 12.49% rated it as 5 (primary use).
- Virtualization: 20.20% rated their use of Linux for virtualization as 5 (primary use), and 23.04% rated it as 1 (little use).
- Edge Computing: 68.36% rated their use for edge computing as 1 (little use), while 3.76% rated it as 5 (primary use).
- IoT Applications: 64.95% use of Linux for IoT applications (rated 1), and 4.54% rated it as 5 (primary use).
- Machine Learning: 68.64% primarily use Linux for machine learning (rated 5), and 4.19% rated it as 5 (primary use).
- Blockchain: A significant majority (89.00%) of respondents indicated little use of Linux for blockchain (rated 1).
- Gaming: 31.04% primarily use Linux for gaming (rated 5), and 25.58% rated it as 1 (little use).
- Other: For other use cases, 28.88% primarily use Linux (rated 5), and 24.67% rated it as 1 (little use).
Please note that these percentages represent the distribution of responses among the survey participants.
Cloud computing
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 460 41.70% 58.20% 2 (2) 182 16.50% 3 (3) 192 17.41% 17.41% 4 (4) 120 10.88% 5 (5) 149 13.51% 24.39% No answer 170 10.76% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Containerization
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 386 34.68% 52.83% 2 (2) 202 18.15% 3 (3) 193 17.34% 17.34% 4 (4) 178 15.99% 5 (5) 154 13.84% 29.83% No answer 160 10.13% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Configuration Management
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 327 30.53% 50.61% 2 (2) 215 20.07% 3 (3) 238 22.22% 22.22% 4 (4) 164 15.31% 5 (5) 127 11.86% 27.17% No answer 202 12.78% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Desktop Computing
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 40 3.27% 4.65% 2 (2) 17 1.39% 3 (3) 63 5.14% 5.14% 4 (4) 110 8.98% 5 (5) 995 81.22% 90.20% No answer 48 3.04% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Server Infrastructure
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 333 29.95% 43.79% 2 (2) 154 13.85% 3 (3) 188 16.91% 16.91% 4 (4) 142 12.77% 5 (5) 295 26.53% 39.30% No answer 161 10.19% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Serverless Computing
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 608 64.34% 76.61% 2 (2) 116 12.28% 3 (3) 103 10.90% 10.90% 4 (4) 54 5.71% 5 (5) 64 6.77% 12.49% No answer 328 20.76% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Virtualization
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 259 23.04% 39.95% 2 (2) 190 16.90% 3 (3) 238 21.17% 21.17% 4 (4) 210 18.68% 5 (5) 227 20.20% 38.88% No answer 149 9.43% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Edge Computing
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning litttle use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 618 68.36% 80.09% 2 (2) 106 11.73% 3 (3) 90 9.96% 9.96% 4 (4) 56 6.19% 5 (5) 34 3.76% 9.96% No answer 369 23.35% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
IoT Applications
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 630 64.95% 81.24% 2 (2) 158 16.29% 3 (3) 93 9.59% 9.59% 4 (4) 45 4.64% 5 (5) 44 4.54% 9.18% No answer 303 19.18% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Machine Learning
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 672 68.64% 81.92% 2 (2) 130 13.28% 3 (3) 89 9.09% 9.09% 4 (4) 47 4.80% 5 (5) 41 4.19% 8.99% No answer 294 18.61% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Blockchain
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning litttle use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 833 89.00% 94.98% 2 (2) 56 5.98% 3 (3) 28 2.99% 2.99% 4 (4) 9 0.96% 5 (5) 10 1.07% 2.03% No answer 337 21.33% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Gaming
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 286 25.58% 36.40% 2 (2) 121 10.82% 3 (3) 180 16.10% 16.10% 4 (4) 184 16.46% 5 (5) 347 31.04% 47.50% No answer 155 9.81% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Other
Rate your use of IT 1 through 5? (1 meaning little use and 5 being primary use)
Answer Count Percentage Sum 1 (1) 170 24.67% 31.93% 2 (2) 50 7.26% 3 (3) 184 26.71% 26.71% 4 (4) 86 12.48% 5 (5) 199 28.88% 41.36% No answer 584 36.96% 0.00% Not completed or Not displayed 307 19.43% 0.00%
Distro Use Cases
What did people say the use cases are for the following distros.
Tumbleweed
The use cases for openSUSE Tumbleweed are diverse and cover a wide range of activities. Users rely on Tumbleweed for internet browsing, programming, note-taking, music listening, and even gaming. It serves as a daily driver for many, including office applications and software development. Tumbleweed is used on both servers and desktops, and some users appreciate its continuous rolling updates and cutting-edge features. It's employed for testing purposes, container environments, and experimental features. For many, Tumbleweed is their main operating system, offering a combination of stability and the latest software. It is a preferred choice for development, multimedia, and daily personal tasks, including watching videos and listening to music. In summary, openSUSE Tumbleweed caters to a broad spectrum of users, from developers to gamers, offering a rolling release experience with a focus on keeping software up to date and stable.
Leap
openSUSE Leap serves a variety of purposes for its users. It is utilized for tasks like club finance management, personal finance management, photography archive and management, document production, and family communication. Some users rely on it as a stable and reliable system for both desktop and server needs. It's commonly used as a home server, NAS, and for various server applications. openSUSE Leap is praised for its stability, bulletproof performance, and reliability, making it an excellent choice for server-related tasks. Some users appreciate the fact that it doesn't require constant upgrades and provides a consistent interface throughout its supported lifespan.
On the desktop side, it's used for general computing, including internet usage, document handling, and multimedia activities. Some users prefer it as their primary operating system, emphasizing its stability for everyday tasks. Additionally, openSUSE Leap is chosen for its compatibility with SUSE's enterprise-grade distributions, making it an ideal choice for learning more about SUSE. In summary, openSUSE Leap caters to users who prioritize stability and a consistent experience, both on the desktop and for server-related tasks. It is a reliable choice for various computing needs, including personal, professional, and educational use cases.
MicroOS (Aeon, Kalpa, Server)
openSUSE MicroOS (Aeon, Kalpa, Server) caters to a diverse range of use cases. Users are interested in its potential, including for desktop and server applications, as well as IoT devices. It is seen as a solution for low-end computers and container hosting, with some users emphasizing its role as a Kubernetes (K8s) platform.
While some are not interested in or do not see advantages in MicroOS, others are exploring it for development, testing, and experimentation purposes. It is used for work, college, gaming, and home server needs.
Despite mixed opinions, openSUSE MicroOS is being considered for various scenarios, from providing secure, immutable desktop environments to running containers and virtualization. Some users appreciate its self-maintenance and update handling, making it an attractive option for server and IoT applications.
In summary, openSUSE MicroOS serves a wide spectrum of use cases, from professional and hobby development to secure and low-maintenance server and desktop setups. It is an intriguing option for those seeking to explore the benefits of an immutable operating system.
Leap Micro
Users have varying opinions and use cases for openSUSE Leap Micro. While some express disinterest and see no advantage in this system, others are experimenting with it, primarily as a container host or server. Some are waiting for it to become generally available for desktop use, indicating a potential future application as a desktop OS.
A common theme is its role in containerization and virtualization, with users mentioning experiments with containers and the use of Leap Micro on servers. Some users are considering it for home labing and self-hosting purposes, while others are planning to test it for specific projects.
In summary, openSUSE Leap Micro has a range of potential use cases, primarily centered around containers, virtualization, and server applications, with some users exploring it for future desktop use.
Slowroll
openSUSE SlowRoll is a new distribution that aims to bridge the gap between the stable but aging Leap and the cutting-edge but fast-paced Tumbleweed. It is a rolling release that updates on a monthly basis, providing users with a balance of freshness and stability. Many users are interested in SlowRoll for various reasons, such as:
- Server Use: Some users find SlowRoll appealing for server use, as it offers a modern but reliable OS that does not require frequent updates or major upgrades. Some users also hope for better integration with docker and other tools.
- Stable Base: Some users prefer a stable base that does not change too often, but still provides access to newer software and features. Some users compare SlowRoll to FreeBSD’s RELEASE or STABLE branches, or to older versions of openSUSE that they miss.
- Lower Surprise: Some users want to avoid surprises or breakages that may occur with Tumbleweed’s rapid updates. They also want to reduce the size of update downloads and the frequency of update notifications.
- Faster GNOME/KDE: Some users are eager to get the latest versions of GNOME or KDE faster than Leap, without having to switch to Tumbleweed. They value the user experience and the performance of these desktop environments.
- Leap Alternative: Some users are looking for an alternative to Leap that would eliminate the need for major upgrades every 18 months. They also want to avoid the obsolescence of some packages in Leap.
SlowRoll may not be suitable for everyone; some users are happy with Tumbleweed or Leap, and some doubt the viability of SlowRoll. However, SlowRoll has the potential to attract a new group of users who are looking for a recent and stable distribution that updates at a moderate pace.
Reasons for use include: reasons why users are interested in openSUSE SlowRoll and what makes this distribution appealing to them:
- Balancing Stability and Freshness: Many users appreciate the desire for a distribution that strikes a balance between stability and up-to-date software. They find SlowRoll to be a compromise between the highly stable Leap and the rapidly updating Tumbleweed.
- Server-Friendly: Some users see SlowRoll as a suitable option for server environments where stability is crucial, and frequent updates may pose challenges.
- Predictable Update Cadence: The regular monthly updates of SlowRoll are seen as a convenient and predictable way to keep the system current without the need for frequent large-scale upgrades.
- User-Friendly for Beginners: SlowRoll is considered a good option for beginners or family members who may not be comfortable with frequent updates or complex upgrade processes.
- Addressing the Leap Transition: Some users express interest in SlowRoll due to concerns about Leap's future. They are looking for a stable alternative.
- Better Software Compatibility: SlowRoll is seen as a way to achieve better software compatibility compared to Tumbleweed, particularly for those not wanting to deal with frequent updates.
- Reduced Update Frequency: Users with limited internet connectivity or older hardware appreciate the less frequent updates, reducing data usage and performance strain.
- Maintaining Stability: SlowRoll aims to offer stable updates while avoiding potential breakages that can occur with more frequent updates.
Transition from Leap: As Leap users face a transition, SlowRoll is considered a suitable alternative, providing a rolling release with a slower update pace.
- Slower Cadence for Secondary Devices: SlowRoll is seen as ideal for secondary devices that are not used as frequently and don't require the same rapid update cycle as Tumbleweed.
- Improved Software Management: Users want an efficient way to manage software without redundant updates and hope SlowRoll addresses this issue.
- Sustainability: Some users appreciate the slower update pace for its potential sustainability benefits and reduced load on openSUSE infrastructure.
- Experimental Interest: Some express curiosity about SlowRoll but may not be convinced of its value or specific use case yet.
Home/Hobby Use: Questions & Results
Summary
In the survey, respondents reported their use of various technologies at home and as services. Notably, 10.82% use cloud computing at home, 36.90% use desktop computing, and 26.65% use gaming technologies. Conversely, 30.13% do not use blockchain at home, and 27.78% do not use edge computing. In terms of services, 12.34% use desktop computing, while 25.95% use machine learning. Additionally, 5.57% of respondents are not interested in the Adaptable Linux Platform. The survey provides insights into the adoption of these technologies among home and hobby users.
Cloud computing
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 171 10.82% No (AO02) 356 22.53% No answer 100 6.33% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 198 12.53% No (AO02) 281 17.78% No answer 148 9.37% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Containerization
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 298 18.86% No (AO02) 244 15.44% No answer 85 5.38% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 108 6.84% No (AO02) 361 22.85% No answer 158 10.00% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Configuration Management
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 216 13.67% No (AO02) 295 18.67% No answer 116 7.34% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 76 4.81% No (AO02) 386 24.43% No answer 165 10.44% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Desktop Computing
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 583 36.90% No (AO02) 10 0.63% No answer 34 2.15% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 195 12.34% No (AO02) 300 18.99% No answer 132 8.35% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Server Infrastructure
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 260 16.46% No (AO02) 278 17.59% No answer 89 5.63% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 136 8.61% No (AO02) 328 20.76% No answer 163 10.32% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Serverless Computing
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 75 4.75% No (AO02) 416 26.33% No answer 136 8.61% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 37 2.34% No (AO02) 410 25.95% No answer 180 11.39% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Virtualization
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 377 23.86% No (AO02) 171 10.82% No answer 79 5.00% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 135 8.54% No (AO02) 338 21.39% No answer 154 9.75% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Edge Computing
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 47 2.97% No (AO02) 439 27.78% No answer 141 8.92% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 20 1.27% No (AO02) 417 26.39% No answer 190 12.03% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
IoT Applications
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 133 8.42% No (AO02) 376 23.80% No answer 118 7.47% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 62 3.92% No (AO02) 390 24.68% No answer 175 11.08% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Machine Learning
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 92 5.82% No (AO02) 410 25.95% No answer 125 7.91% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 47 2.97% No (AO02) 398 25.19% No answer 182 11.52% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Blockchain
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 21 1.33% No (AO02) 476 30.13% No answer 130 8.23% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 14 0.89% No (AO02) 432 27.34% No answer 181 11.46% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Gaming
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 421 26.65% No (AO02) 131 8.29% No answer 75 4.75% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 165 10.44% No (AO02) 301 19.05% No answer 161 10.19% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Other
What of the following do you use at home? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 245 15.51% No (AO02) 124 7.85% No answer 258 16.33% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
What of the following do you use at home as a service? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 116 7.34% No (AO02) 223 14.11% No answer 288 18.23% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Are you interested in the Adaptable Linux Platform?
Yes (Y) 286 18.10% No (N) 168 10.63% No answer 173 10.95% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Are you interested in the new distribution Slowroll?
Yes (Y) 340 21.52% No (N) 154 9.75% No answer 133 8.42% Not completed or Not displayed 953 60.32%
Work/Business Use: Questions & Results
Summary
In the survey, approximately 15% of respondents reported using Cloud Computing for work/business, while around 16% reported using it as a service. Similarly, around 15-18% used technologies like Containerization, Configuration Management, Desktop Computing, Server Infrastructure, Serverless Computing, and Virtualization for work/business, and 10-13% used them as services.
Cloud computing
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 240 15.19% No (AO02) 141 8.92% No answer 44 2.78% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 257 16.27% No (AO02) 112 7.09% No answer 56 3.54% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Containerization
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 244 15.44% No (AO02) 138 8.73% No answer 43 2.72% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 168 10.63% No (AO02) 187 11.84% No answer 70 4.43% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Configuration Management
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 235 14.87% No (AO02) 133 8.42% No answer 57 3.61% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 147 9.30% No (AO02) 194 12.28% No answer 84 5.32% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Desktop Computing
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 352 22.28% No (AO02) 44 2.78% No answer 29 1.84% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 172 10.89% No (AO02) 187 11.84% No answer 66 4.18% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Server Infrastructure
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 292 18.48% No (AO02) 91 5.76% No answer 42 2.66% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 242 15.32% No (AO02) 114 7.22% No answer 69 4.37% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Serverless Computing
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 90 5.70% No (AO02) 262 16.58% No answer 73 4.62% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 102 6.46% No (AO02) 221 13.99% No answer 102 6.46% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Virtualization
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 275 17.41% No (AO02) 107 6.77% No answer 43 2.72% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 198 12.53% No (AO02) 146 9.24% No answer 81 5.13%
Edge Computing
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 70 4.43% No (AO02) 264 16.71% No answer 91 5.76% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 61 3.86% No (AO02) 256 16.20% No answer 108 6.84%
IoT Applications
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 61 3.86% No (AO02) 288 18.23% No answer 76 4.81% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 60 3.80% No (AO02) 260 16.46% No answer 105 6.65% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Machine Learning
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 100 6.33% No (AO02) 249 15.76% No answer 76 4.81% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 74 4.68% No (AO02) 243 15.38% No answer 108 6.84%
Blockchain
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 17 1.08% No (AO02) 327 20.70% No answer 81 5.13% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 14 0.89% No (AO02) 305 19.30% No answer 106 6.71% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Gaming
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 43 2.72% No (AO02) 315 19.94% No answer 67 4.24% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 28 1.77% No (AO02) 298 18.86% No answer 99 6.27% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Other
What of the following do you use for work/business use? (Select all that apply)
Yes (AO01) 122 7.72% No (AO02) 115 7.28% No answer 188 11.90% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
What of the following do you/your company use as a service? (Select all that apply
Yes (AO01) 87 5.51% No (AO02) 146 9.24% No answer 192 12.15% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Are you interested in the Adaptable Linux Platform?
Yes (Y) 216 13.67% No (N) 88 5.57% No answer 121 7.66% Not completed or Not displayed 1155 73.10%
Service Satisfaction
Summary
In the survey, respondents expressed dissatisfaction with various IT services for different reasons. For Cloud Computing, dissatisfaction stemmed from security concerns, high costs, and integration challenges. For Containerization, users desired better security and automation tools. Configuration Management users sought improved online management and flexibility. Desktop Computing users wanted better graphical upgrades and software deployment. Server Infrastructure dissatisfaction arose from cost concerns and the need for better management tools. Serverless Computing users desired innovation and improved security. Virtualization users faced challenges with installation and performance. Edge Computing users wanted better automation and security. IoT Applications users found services confusing and called for innovation. Machine Learning users preferred open-source solutions and performance improvements. Blockchain dissatisfaction was expressed without specific details. Gaming users desired better gaming support, compatibility, and performance. Other services dissatisfaction ranged from the lack of a virtual keyboard to compatibility issues with corporate applications, with some users recommending open-source solutions.
Cloud computing
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 73 4.62% Not Satisfied (AO02) 34 2.15% Neutral (AO03) 110 6.96% Satisfied (AO04) 133 8.42% No answer 75 4.75%
Many individuals expressed dissatisfaction with the cloud computing services used by their company for various reasons. Security concerns were a recurring theme, with some pointing out that they don't trust the security of cloud providers' systems. High costs and the need for significant application integration were common complaints, with a desire for more cost-effective and flexible options. Others emphasized the importance of performance, management, and visibility, as well as reliability. Some expressed frustration with the slow speeds and painful experiences when using cloud folders. There was also a dislike for monopolies and a desire to reduce dependence on Microsoft and Google products. Open source solutions and a preference for on-premises cloud like Kubernetes were mentioned. Standardization and open standards were proposed to make cloud services more user-friendly and compatible. The complexity of some cloud services for simpler tasks and the lack of specialized tech personnel were also cited as issues. A multi-cloud approach and the use of free and open-source software (FLOSS) services were advocated for. In summary, dissatisfaction with cloud computing services primarily stemmed from concerns about security, cost, integration, and the desire for more standardized and user-friendly solutions.
Containerization
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 96 6.08% Not Satisfied (AO02) 18 1.14% Neutral (AO03) 86 5.44% Satisfied (AO04) 127 8.04% No answer 98 6.20%
People who answered express dissatisfaction with their current containerization services for various reasons. Some of them highlight the need for migration to Rancher, which they see as a more suitable option for managing Docker containers. They also emphasize the importance of better security and management, with a desire for improved tools for pipeline building and automation. Additionally, there's a need for increased awareness of containerization benefits among managers and a desire for on-premises solutions, though cost is a concern. Other aspects include a lack of security updates, slow performance with an OS, a deficit of knowledge for implementation, and limited usage, making improvement challenging. Overall, the dissatisfaction stems from issues with security, performance, management, and a lack of alignment with the company's future plans.
Configuration Management
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 92 5.82% Not Satisfied (AO02) 25 1.58% Neutral (AO03) 93 5.89% Satisfied (AO04) 105 6.65% No answer 110 6.96%
People who answered express dissatisfaction with the current Configuration Management services for various reasons. They desire better online management capabilities and complain about the lack of quality examples for writing Salt statements to manage the infrastructure effectively. Additionally, they wish for more flexibility in managing flatpaks and containers through YaST. The need for making configurations less dependent on the OS and promoting innovation is emphasized. There's a call for increased automation with Uyuni and a desire for better tools for user management and security within YaST. Some express discontent with the current use of Git and GitLab, citing issues with these tools. Security concerns are raised as well, indicating a need for improvement in this area. Others seek more awareness of the benefits of Configuration Management among managers. Some feel that the existing system has too many issues and could be significantly improved. They prefer standard patterns over custom solutions and are cautious about depending on Microsoft Active Directory. However, a few individuals are content with the current setup and see no need for improvement. The dissatisfaction largely revolves around issues of tool quality, security, and the desire for more user-friendly and effective solutions.
Desktop Computing
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 59 3.73% Not Satisfied (AO02) 38 2.41% Neutral (AO03) 69 4.37% Satisfied (AO04) 183 11.58% No answer 76 4.81%
People who answered express a wide range of dissatisfaction with the current Desktop Computing services they use. They desire better graphical upgrades, full interoperability, and suggest the use of Linux for a more seamless desktop experience. Some request that desktop environments like GNOME adopt a more traditional configuration style. There are concerns about the current implementation, management, updates, and deployment of desktop systems. Users are looking for improvements in security, graphics card support, and the availability of HDR support for KDE Plasma and Firefox.
Some express a preference for openSUSE over Windows but face challenges with VPN setup. Others wish for a corporate-branded openSUSE installation, longer lifecycles, and simplified user experiences, especially for new users. Linux is seen as a viable alternative to Windows, but concerns remain about software compatibility and the need for better codecs and hardware acceleration. The desire to standardize to one desktop environment is evident, and some users wish to see fewer proprietary software packages and a shift towards Linux workstations.
In general, dissatisfaction is rooted in issues of software reliability, security, the use of proprietary software, and the desire for more freedom in choosing their desktop environment. Many have varied preferences and concerns regarding the use of Linux, Windows, and cloud-based solutions.
Server Infrastructure
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 49 3.10% Not Satisfied (AO02) 22 1.39% Neutral (AO03) 76 4.81% Satisfied (AO04) 188 11.90% No answer 90 5.70%
People who responded express their dissatisfaction with the current server infrastructure services for various reasons. Some suggest a shift from Windows servers to Linux for a more cost-effective and flexible solution. Concerns are raised about the cost of integrating less expensive options and a desire for more tools to provision bare metal servers.
Innovation and improved functionality for Yast2cli are highlighted as areas of improvement. Some acknowledge that there has been self-inflicted mismanagement of Linux, which may have impacted the server infrastructure. Security is cited as a major concern, emphasizing the need for better protection. There's a call for hosting more services and implementing a self-service portal to streamline server requests. A stable base for long-supported applications is deemed crucial, and outside input and best practices are welcomed. Cost management is stressed, urging a more efficient use of resources and a focus on reducing expenses.
The use of open-source (FLOSS) services is encouraged, and some express the need to move away from AWS, possibly in search of more predictable performance and access to bare metal machines for critical applications. In summary, dissatisfaction with server infrastructure services is rooted in concerns about cost, security, performance, and the desire for more innovation and flexibility.
Serverless Computing
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 174 11.01% Not Satisfied (AO02) 8 0.51% Neutral (AO03) 56 3.54% Satisfied (AO04) 44 2.78% No answer 143 9.05%
People who responded express their dissatisfaction with the current serverless computing services for various reasons. The need for innovation in these services is highlighted, suggesting a desire for improvements and advancements in functionality.
Security is a major concern, with users expressing that the existing security measures are inadequate. Some take a skeptical view of serverless computing, asserting that it's an everyday reality that software still needs to run somewhere, potentially indicating a preference for more traditional approaches. Others mention that the services are not currently in use, making it difficult to assess and improve them. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of serverless computing is questioned, with a sentiment that it can be more expensive by design. The advice given is to use it sparingly, primarily when IT is not the core business, and to avoid overusing it.
In summary, dissatisfaction with serverless computing services is driven by concerns about innovation, security, cost, and the practicality of this approach in the context of the company's needs and objectives.
Virtualization
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 71 4.49% Not Satisfied (AO02) 17 1.08% Neutral (AO03) 84 5.32% Satisfied (AO04) 148 9.37% No answer 105 6.65%
People who responded express their dissatisfaction with the current virtualization services for various reasons. They find it difficult to install a Windows 11 machine, highlighting the need for better integration of virtualization hosts, a task that some are willing to work on when they have time.
The speed of I/O and the performance of virtualization are of concern, and users want easier installation and usage with improved performance. There is a call for innovation in virtualization services.
Issues with VirtualBox's speed and network firewall rules are raised, suggesting a need for better management GUI tools for multiple KVM hosts. Security is criticized, and users want the ability to use virtual machines for testing without needing to install temporary tools on the host OS.
Some express a desire for an alternative to VMWare, with a mention of a lack of competitive offerings. Better infrastructure management and increased speed are sought, although there are concerns about the performance of an OS. Users want more flexibility in VM creation, including GPU passthrough.
While some express contentment with the existing services, there are also requests for better virtualization management tools, the use of open-source (FLOSS) services, and better performance for database servers on Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD).
In summary, dissatisfaction with virtualization services revolves around installation difficulties, performance, management, security, and the desire for more flexibility and innovation in the virtualization environment.
Edge Computing
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 195 12.34% Not Satisfied (AO02) 7 0.44% Neutral (AO03) 52 3.29% Satisfied (AO04) 27 1.71% No answer 144 9.11%
People who responded express their dissatisfaction with the current edge computing services for various reasons. They emphasize the need for innovation, signaling a desire for improved and more advanced edge computing solutions. Better automation is sought, suggesting a need for streamlining processes and reducing manual tasks. Security is a significant concern, with users pointing out that the existing security measures are inadequate.
Some people mention the rarity of long-living, transactional, self-managing systems and the lack of documentation for such systems, which hampers their usability and implementation.
There are references to the need for better integration with central tools for deploying software, indicating a desire for a more cohesive and efficient software deployment process. Additionally, users express the desire for increased computing capability at a lower cost within the same environmental package, highlighting the importance of cost-effectiveness and performance.
In summary, dissatisfaction with edge computing services is driven by the desire for innovation, better automation, enhanced security, improved documentation, integration with central tools, and cost-efficiency.
IoT Applications
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 206 13.04% Not Satisfied (AO02) 9 0.57% Neutral (AO03) 51 3.23% Satisfied (AO04) 20 1.27% No answer 139 8.80%
Those who responded express their dissatisfaction with the current IoT application services for various reasons. They find the services confusing and feel that they require too much prior knowledge about the platform, making them challenging to use effectively.
Innovation is highlighted as an area for improvement, suggesting a desire for more advanced and cutting-edge IoT solutions. Some indicate that they are not currently using these services or are not actively engaged in IoT applications. There is a reference to the rarity of long-living, transactional, and self-managing systems, and the lack of documentation for such systems, which creates usability issues. Additionally, very few individuals are utilizing these services.
Some express disinterest in IoT applications, stating that they are not involved in that area. However, others mention the need for better integration with central tools for deploying software, indicating a desire for a more streamlined and cohesive deployment process.
Lastly, the challenge of supporting multiple networking infrastructures concurrently, such as GSM EDGE, NB IoT, LoraWAN, Ethernet, and Wi-Fi, is noted, implying the complexity of managing diverse IoT connectivity options. In summary, dissatisfaction with IoT application services stems from issues related to usability, the desire for innovation, a lack of use or interest, the need for better documentation and integration, and the challenges of supporting multiple networking infrastructures.
Machine Learning
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 189 11.96% Not Satisfied (AO02) 15 0.95% Neutral (AO03) 52 3.29% Satisfied (AO04) 27 1.71% No answer 142 8.99%
Those who responded express their dissatisfaction with the current machine learning services for various reasons. They find machine learning services offered by external providers too proprietary and prefer in-house implementations using open-source technologies.
One individual's response is simply "Ok," indicating a lack of specific complaints or needs. Innovation is not mentioned as an area for improvement.
Some express the need for easier access to machines, highlighting a desire for more straightforward and efficient access to the resources required for machine learning projects. Others mention the need for more GPU power and improved scheduling, underlining the importance of performance and resource management.
Using up-to-date versions of systems that implement machine learning is deemed necessary for staying current and effective in this field.
There's a clear emphasis on treating machine learning as a practical tool rather than a novelty. Users are advised to structure and prepare data properly, avoid rushing into machine learning, and prevent the development of biased algorithms that merely reflect existing understanding. They stress the importance of using data to gain insights and understanding.
Lastly, there is a call to run machine learning pipelines with the same level of continuous integration and reliability as is available to developers, emphasizing the need for robust and reliable machine learning processes.
In summary, dissatisfaction with machine learning services is driven by concerns about proprietary offerings, the need for in-house open-source implementations, access to resources, performance, up-to-date systems, and the responsible and practical use of machine learning as a tool in the organization's workflows.
Blockchain
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 253 16.01% Not Satisfied (AO02) 4 0.25% Neutral (AO03) 15 0.95% Satisfied (AO04) 6 0.38% No answer 147 9.30%
Those who responded express a strong negative sentiment toward blockchain. There's no specific mention of innovation or any potential areas for improvement. Responses were minimal, cryptic and lacked clarity and detail regarding the specific issues or concerns with the services, making it challenging to discern the exact nature of the dissatisfaction with its use.
Gaming
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 221 13.99% Not Satisfied (AO02) 6 0.38% Neutral (AO03) 26 1.65% Satisfied (AO04) 29 1.84% No answer 143 9.05%
Those who responded express their dissatisfaction with the current gaming services for various reasons. They call for better gaming support, suggesting a need for improvements in this area.
There are mentions of issues related to the use of NVIDIA graphics cards under Wayland on openSUSE, indicating a lack of convenience and compatibility in this context. Linux drivers are criticized for not rendering some games properly, ultimately requiring the use of Windows for certain gaming needs.
On a more positive note, some users appreciate the good compatibility, performance, and HDR support in the existing gaming services.
Innovation is highlighted as an area for improvement, suggesting a desire for more advanced and up-to-date gaming features and technologies. The pace of graphics development is seen as slower than Windows, particularly concerning HDR, ray tracing, and GPU drivers.
There are requests for better support of modern graphical features, including HDR and ray tracing, as well as a desire for support for new game releases. The mention of RegataOS, which is based on openSUSE, suggests the potential for openSUSE to take inspiration from such initiatives.
VR is mentioned as a specific area of interest and potential improvement. Users express a general wish for every game to work effectively, suggesting a desire for enhanced compatibility.
However, some responses lack specific details, with phrases like "no idea," making it challenging to discern the exact nature of the dissatisfaction in those cases. In summary, dissatisfaction with gaming services is driven by issues related to compatibility, performance, graphics development, and support for modern gaming features, as well as a desire for better innovation and VR support.
Other
Rate how satisfied you are with the IT services you/your company use?
Don't Use (AO01) 103 6.52% Not Satisfied (AO02) 5 0.32% Neutral (AO03) 56 3.54% Satisfied (AO04) 42 2.66% No answer 219 13.86%
Those who responded express their dissatisfaction with other services for various reasons. One of the concerns raised is the lack of a proper built-in virtual keyboard, which is seen as necessary for security and other purposes. This indicates a need for enhanced security features.
Another user points out that while it may not be an openSUSE-specific problem, Linux, in general, lacks traction among end-users in the multimedia and creative suite sectors. They suggest that Linux isn't attractive enough as a platform for digital artists, emphasizing the need for more innovation and user-friendly tools in this area. Some users express dissatisfaction with the lack of Linux support for certain corporate applications, listing examples like Oracle Content Experience desktop client, Microsoft Outlook desktop, Microsoft Office, and Cisco telephony. This indicates a need for better compatibility with widely used software, particularly in corporate environments. A few responses are marked as "N/A," indicating that the users may not have specific issues or needs related to the other services. However, one response suggests that the term "other" could possibly refer to AI services, and they clarify that the company is not currently using AI technologies.
There is also a recommendation to use open-source (FLOSS) services, highlighting a preference for open and community-driven solutions.
In summary, dissatisfaction with other services primarily revolves around the need for improved security features, better support for creative and multimedia sectors, more innovation, and enhanced compatibility with widely used corporate applications on Linux. Additionally, users express a preference for open-source solutions.
General Questions
What do you believe are the primary factors driving the growth of Linux and open-source technologies in your industry?
In summary, the primary factors driving the growth of Linux and open-source technologies in various industries include cost savings, fast deployment, the need for scientific applications and platforms beyond business-oriented Microsoft applications, and increased interest leading to more software development. Other key drivers include digital sovereignty, regulatory compliance, and cost considerations. In the telecom industry, the migration to Linux and open-source platforms is a major trend.
The open development and contribution model, along with the decentralization of larger companies, is contributing to the growth of open source. Employee preferences for Linux and personal interests in traditional industries are also driving adoption. Concerns about Windows' subscription model and privacy issues have led to a shift towards open source alternatives.
Linux's robustness, security, adaptability, and open APIs are key factors. The availability of vendors like SUSE with helpful technical support is driving adoption, as well as ease of use and the avoidance of intrusive paid services. Innovations such as containers and cloud technology are further promoting Linux and open-source adoption. Copy-left licensing, access to source code, and adaptability play a role in growth.
The broad availability of open-source software in various industries, from astronomy to high-performance computing, offers quality solutions. Linux's security, reliability, stability, and extensive ecosystem satisfy diverse needs. Factors like virtualization, cost, reliability, transparency, and avoiding vendor lock-in are also contributing to the growth of Linux and open-source technologies. Overall, these factors reflect the adaptability and cost-effectiveness of Linux and open-source solutions across different sectors.
Are there any specific challenges/barriers hindering wider adoption of the technologies cited above in your industry?
In various industries, there are several challenges and barriers hindering wider adoption of Linux and open-source technologies. These include:
Industry-specific software: Many industries rely on specialized software that is designed for Windows environments. In some cases, these applications have no Linux-compatible alternatives. This is a significant barrier to adoption in sectors like textile, CAD, and graphics design.
Vendor lock-in: Organizations often face challenges in migrating away from existing proprietary technologies due to vendor lock-in. This is especially true when dealing with Microsoft, which dominates the end-user computing space, and Google's dominance in education.
Lack of knowledge and inertia: Many managers and end-users are more familiar with proprietary technologies like Microsoft, and there is often a resistance to change. This is compounded by a lack of knowledge about Linux and open source among IT staff and management.
Compatibility and software support: Some critical legacy and proprietary software do not have Linux versions or suitable alternatives. Lack of support from third-party vendors for Linux also poses a barrier to adoption.
Fragmentation and choice: The wide variety of Linux distributions and desktop environments can be confusing for regular users. This fragmentation can lead to hesitation and lack of standardization.
Documentation and usability: Inconsistent or inadequate documentation and the lack of an end-user-friendly experience on Linux desktops can discourage adoption.
Hardware support: Lack of support for specific hardware and peripherals can be a barrier to adoption, especially when users depend on these devices for their work.
Resistance to change and complacency: Many users and organizations are resistant to change and prefer to stick with familiar systems, even if they are suboptimal.
Reliance on proprietary software and technologies: Industries, such as finance and banking, heavily rely on proprietary software that is considered essential for compliance with regulations.
Training and knowledge: There is a need for better training and knowledge dissemination about Linux and open-source alternatives in educational institutions, workplaces, and among decision-makers.
Overall, the challenges and barriers to wider adoption of Linux and open-source technologies in various industries are complex and multifaceted, ranging from technical compatibility issues to organizational and cultural resistance to change. Overcoming these barriers will require concerted efforts in education, software development, and standardization to make Linux and open source more accessible and user-friendly.
Are there any emerging technologies/trends pertaining to the IT industry you believe will significantly contribute to business growth in the next three to five years? Please explain.
Several emerging technologies and trends are expected to significantly contribute to business growth in the IT industry over the next three to five years. These include:
Containerization: Technologies like containerization (e.g., Docker) and orchestration (e.g., Kubernetes) are becoming increasingly essential for managing and deploying applications. They offer consistent developer experiences and facilitate the transition to cloud-native architectures.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML): AI and ML are having a broad impact on various sectors, from automating tasks to improving business insight and customer satisfaction. AI at the edge, data storage, and communication technologies will drive growth in IT.
- Cloud Computing: Cloud computing is expected to become even more widespread, with businesses leveraging cloud-based services and applications. The shift toward the cloud is driven by remote work, scalability, and accessibility from various devices.
- Edge Computing: Edge computing is gaining prominence, particularly in IoT applications. It reduces latency, making real-time processing and analysis of data more accessible, which has implications for various industries.
- Domain-Specific Applications: Growth in browser-based applications tailored for specific industries.
- Python Integration: The integration of Python with Excel and other applications will streamline processes.
- Scientific Clusters: Use of clusters for scientific applications will advance research and development.
- Blockchain: While blockchain technology continues to evolve, it offers numerous use cases, including improved security, supply chain management, and transparent transactions. Blockchain is expected to drive innovation and growth in several sectors.
- Immutable OS: Immutable operating systems are gaining attention, particularly for their reliability and the ability to roll back the OS easily in case of issues. This trend is particularly relevant for businesses looking to maintain system stability.
- Open Source: The continued growth of open-source software and the commercialization of open-source projects will contribute to business growth. Open-source solutions can provide cost-effective alternatives and greater flexibility.
AI-Assisted Software Development: AI tools that assist developers in tasks such as code optimization, text generation, and image correction will enhance productivity in software development.
- Containerization Standardization (e.g., Flatpak): Efforts to standardize containerization formats like Flatpak will lead to better app availability, particularly on Linux-based systems. This will simplify the distribution and installation of third-party applications.
- Internet of Things (IoT): As more devices and objects become connected to the internet, IoT applications will continue to grow. IoT offers opportunities for data collection, analysis, and automation in various industries.
- Quantum Computing: Advances in quantum computing will enable complex calculations and simulations, offering new opportunities in research and problem-solving.
- Big Data and Analytics: The combination of big data and AI, powered by new-generation processors, opens up opportunities for advanced data analysis and automated processing, providing insights for business growth.
- Standardization of Data Access Protocols: The standardization of data access protocols, especially in environmental data management, will open new applications and enable the development of digital twins for various systems.
These emerging technologies and trends are expected to shape the IT industry, drive innovation, and offer opportunities for businesses to grow and thrive.
In the last three months, have you contributed to an open-source project?
Fedora Infrastructure Project: One participant joined the Fedora Infrastructure project but expressed difficulty navigating it. openSUSE and es.opensuse.org: Several contributors mentioned their involvement in openSUSE, either through translation, bug reporting, or other forms of support.
GitHub Projects: Many mentioned working on GitHub projects, including small open-source projects, symbol viewers for code, and various scripts.
Linux Distribution and Software Projects: Some participants contributed to specific Linux distributions, like Xubuntu, Tumbleweed, or Void Linux. Others mentioned their contributions to various software projects such as Haiku, Mastodon, and OSM.
Documentation and Translation: Several participants contributed through documentation, translation work, or opening bug reports.
Testing and Bug Reports: Many mentioned their involvement in testing and reporting issues for open-source projects.
Personal Open-Source Projects: Some contributors mentioned their own open-source projects and their ongoing work.
Donations: A few participants mentioned donating to open-source projects, such as LibreOffice, KDE, and others.
Limited Coding Skills: Some participants admitted they had limited coding skills but expressed a willingness to help with documentation and user support.
Icon Design: One contributor mentioned creating icons for the Linux Papirus icon theme.
Monetary Donations: A few mentioned contributing through monetary donations to various open-source projects.
Survey Responses: Some participants contributed by responding to surveys from projects like Mozilla.
Linux Distributions: Contributors reported work on various Linux distributions such as Manjaro and Q4OS.
Translation: Multiple contributors mentioned translation work for projects like GNOME, OpenVPN, and Mastodon.
Code Contributions: A few mentioned providing code contributions to projects like Path of Building and Flare.
Bug Reporting: Several contributors mentioned their involvement through bug reporting for projects like KDE, Plasma, and openwrt.
Small Commits and Testing: Several participants mentioned making small commits, testing, and bug reporting for various open-source projects. No Recent Contributions: Some participants indicated that they had not made any contributions in the past three months, often citing a lack of coding skills or limited time.
In summary, the responses show a diverse range of contributions to open-source projects, including code development, documentation, translations, bug reports, and financial support. These contributions help sustain and improve the open-source ecosystem.
In the last three months, have you contributed to openSUSE?
Forum Support: Many contributors reported providing support via the openSUSE forum, helping users troubleshoot issues, and answering questions.
Documentation: Several participants mentioned their involvement in documentation, including maintaining entries on the openSUSE Chinese Wiki, contributing to the Knowledge Base, and helping improve documentation.
Bug Reports: A significant number of contributors engaged in bug reporting and interacting on mailing lists, bugfixes, and bug reports for areas like Tumbleweed, Aeon, Leap, and more.
Packaging: Packaging contributions were mentioned for Tumbleweed, Leap, and Factory, with some reporting maintaining packages for the Build Service and packaging tools.
Translations: Some participants contributed through translations for openSUSE official news and other areas, as well as making contributions to documentation and marketing.
Testing and Bug Fixing: Contributors shared their involvement in testing Tumbleweed, bug reporting, bug fixes, and participation in openQA.
Marketing and Advocacy: A few mentioned marketing and advocacy efforts to promote openSUSE in various ways.
Community Engagement: Some participants reported their community involvement, including attending conferences, supporting forums, and moderating forums.
Challenges and Concerns: A few contributors expressed concerns about the lack of clear onboarding documentation and difficulties navigating openSUSE resources like the Wiki, Bugtracker, and a perceived vagueness surrounding the project's future.
Other Contributions: Miscellaneous contributions were mentioned, such as conducting surveys, filing bug reports, updating Wiki articles, and offering support in various forms.
While many contributors shared active engagement and efforts to contribute to openSUSE in various capacities, there were concerns raised about certain aspects of the project, such as documentation and community engagement. These responses provide insights into both the positive contributions and challenges faced by individuals within the openSUSE community.
Creative Work: Many respondents indicated that they use Linux for their primary use case, such as general computing or software development, but they switch to Windows for creative work like photo and video editing due to the perceived lack of suitable creative apps on Linux.
Multifunctional Use: Some respondents reported using Linux for a wide range of purposes, including finance, video production, graphic design, game development, IoT, and more, indicating that Linux covers their diverse needs.
Gamers: Several mentioned using Linux for gaming, either natively or through compatibility layers like Proton or Wine.
Home Automation and IoT: A few respondents were actively considering or using Linux for home automation, IoT, and other embedded applications.
Hobbyists: Hobbyist activities such as 3D modeling, 3D printing, machine learning, and blockchain experimentation were mentioned as use cases for Linux.
Server and Cloud: Some participants discussed using Linux for hosting servers and cloud-based services.
Self-Hosted Services: A few users highlighted self-hosting applications, such as Nextcloud and Freshrss, as part of their Linux usage.
Mobile and Edge Devices: A few were exploring Linux for mobile devices and edge computing.
Scientific and Research: Linux was mentioned for scientific research, running simulations, and data analysis. Media Production: Some participants expressed interest in using Linux for audio and video editing, animation, and music production.
Educational and Training: Linux was considered for educational and training purposes, including using it in kiosk mode.
Use Everywhere: Some respondents stated that they use Linux for everything and aim to continue doing so wherever possible.
Testing and Experimentation: Linux was preferred for testing and experimentation, including software development, learning new programming languages, and AI research.
Graphics and Design: Some were using Linux for graphic design, 3D modeling, and CAD work.
Server Administration: Linux was used for server administration and remote data analysis in scientific fields.
General Hobby Use: Linux was used for various hobbies like photography, 3D printing, home automation, and more.
Creative Professionals: A few respondents reported using Linux in creative fields like graphics, music, and video production.
Enterprise: A few discussed using Linux for corporate and business applications and in professional settings.
Home Media and NAS: Linux was used as a home media server and for network-attached storage (NAS) setups.
Cloud-Based Development: Linux was actively used for cloud-based development, containerization, and web hosting.
School and Training: Linux was considered for school and training purposes, with some respondents noting the need for open-source training resources.
While some users faced limitations in certain areas due to software availability, the responses showed that Linux is being embraced for an array of use cases, both personal and professional. Additionally, there was a recurring theme of users wanting to extend their use of Linux to more scenarios, such as gaming and creative work, as the ecosystem evolves and matures.
“What specific benefits have you experienced by using Linux in your chosen use case(s)?”
Trust and Privacy: Users appreciate the trustworthiness of Linux, which doesn't collect and sell their data. It provides better privacy and doesn't force updates on them.
Stability and Reliability: Linux is known for its stability and reliability. It doesn't crash often, and users find it dependable for their daily tasks.
Customization: Linux offers extensive customization, allowing users to configure their systems to meet their exact needs. They can choose from a wide range of desktop environments and software.
Low Resource Usage: Linux is efficient and runs well on older hardware, extending the life of aging devices and saving money. Open Source and Free Software: Many users appreciate the open-source nature of Linux and the availability of free software. It gives them freedom, both in terms of using the software and modifying it.
Community and Learning: Linux has a strong and supportive community. Users learn a lot about IT, computing, and how their computer works. It's a platform for gaining knowledge and skills.
Security: Linux is often praised for its security features, including fewer virus risks and greater control over user data.
Flexibility: Users can adapt Linux to their workflows, whether it's for development, gaming, or daily use. It's a versatile operating system.
Cost-Effective: Linux is generally free to use, reducing costs compared to proprietary alternatives. This is especially beneficial for individuals and small organizations.
Containerization and Server Management: Linux is favored for server management, thanks to its containerization capabilities. It's often seen as an ideal platform for DevOps professionals.
Performance: Many users report that Linux offers better performance, stability, and speed compared to other operating systems. Choice and Variety: Linux provides users with a wide range of choices, from distributions and desktop environments to software and tools. Users appreciate the diversity and options available.
Overall, Linux users value its open nature, customization, security, and the control it provides over their computing environment. It's clear that Linux serves a wide range of needs and preferences across its user base.
What challenges or limitations have you encountered when using our distributions for your primary or secondary use case(s)?
Outdated Software: Difficulty accessing the latest software packages, affecting software like Docker.
Limited Host Support: Some hosts do not provide images for openSUSE, limiting platform usability.
Encryption Issues: Problems setting up hard drive encryption, including keyboard layout issues during boot.
Documentation and Support: Inadequate documentation and challenges finding support, especially for data science.
Graphics Card Setup: Configuration issues with graphics cards and difficulties getting community assistance.
Compatibility: Issues running Windows programs under Wine/Proton, requiring complex troubleshooting.
Hardware Integration: Problems with hardware integration, including graphics card switching and docking.
Choice Overload: OpenSUSE's abundance of options can overwhelm new users.
Multimedia Codecs: Issues with multimedia codecs and the absence of some software packages.
Incomplete Documentation: OpenSUSE's documentation can be challenging to comprehend, especially for new tools.
VPN Compatibility: Problems with corporate VPN solutions due to different naming conventions.
Learning Curve: A steep learning curve for users new to Linux.
Gaming Support: Support for certain games and peripherals can be problematic.
Proprietary Software: Limited support for proprietary software and hardware, including graphics drivers.
Frequent Upgrades: Users find the need for frequent fresh installations onerous.
Battery Life and Performance: Users have reported issues with battery life, performance, and resource usage.
Troubleshooting: Troubleshooting problems can be challenging, particularly for less experienced users.
Hardware Compatibility: Challenges with hardware support, including printers, graphics cards, and touchpad configuration.
Filesystem Read-Only: Ext4 root partitions on virtual machines can go 'read-only' unexpectedly, requiring backups.
Network Scanner Compatibility: Difficulty recognizing network scanners, occasionally requiring the use of Windows machines.
Despite these challenges, openSUSE users appreciate the flexibility and choices the distribution offers and find the investment in learning to be worthwhile. OpenSUSE has a strong community and user base, and many of these issues can be addressed through community support and further development.
Many of the comments indicate that users have explored Linux-based solutions for edge computing and IoT applications, with a mix of experiences and perceived benefits:
- Some users mentioned that Linux, especially in combination with containers and WebAssembly (WASM), is excellent for edge and IoT applications.
- Linux is recognized for providing full control over services and being reliable for various IoT use cases, including home automation, home servers, and multimedia control.
- Several users highlighted the use of Raspberry Pi devices for IoT, surveillance, and home automation.
- The ability to build custom Linux distributions for IoT applications using tools like Yocto was appreciated.
- Despite the benefits, some users mentioned challenges, including the heavyweight nature of current Linux distributions and the need for more self-managing capability in IoT solutions.
- Notable benefits of Linux for edge computing include faster development, the ability to run compute-intensive tasks, and the capacity to keep data and services in-house.
- Users emphasized the importance of Linux's open nature, privacy, and freedom from IoT platform capture or abandonment.
- Challenges mentioned include the need for stable power supplies, reliable storage, and efficient service separation.
Overall, Linux-based solutions seem to offer flexibility and control for edge computing and IoT applications, with the trade-offs of managing updates and hardware considerations.
Are there particular Linux distributions or flavors that you prefer for specific use cases? If so, which ones and why?
It's clear that there is a wide range of Linux distributions preferred by different users based on their specific needs and preferences. Some common themes and distributions mentioned in the comments include:
openSUSE (Leap and Tumbleweed): Many users prefer openSUSE for its stability, Yast configuration tool, and rolling release option (Tumbleweed).
Debian: Known for its stability, Debian is a popular choice for servers and desktops, especially among those who don't want frequent updates.
Ubuntu: Frequently chosen for its extensive software repositories, user-friendly nature, and long-term support (LTS) versions.
Fedora: Chosen for its cutting-edge features, and Kinoite, a Fedora variant with features like Toolbox and Podman, was mentioned as providing an excellent experience.
Arch Linux: Selected by users who appreciate the ability to customize their system, stay up-to-date with the latest software, and are comfortable with a DIY approach. CentOS / RHEL / Oracle Linux: Picked for their stability and reliability, especially in server environments.
Kubuntu: A flavor of Ubuntu, known for its KDE desktop environment.
Manjaro: Chosen for its user-friendliness and its close relationship with Arch Linux.
Zorin OS: Known for its user-friendly interface, making it a good choice for beginners transitioning from other operating systems.
Gentoo: Preferred by advanced users who appreciate the control and optimization it offers.
NixOS: Selected for its unique approach to package management and system configuration.
Solus: Used for light desktop usage and integration purposes.
Amazon Linux: Employed in AWS environments due to compatibility.
Alpine Linux: Known for its speedy package management.
Garuda Linux: Used for home desktop use, offering unique KDE customizations.
TrueNAS / Proxmox: Preferred for storage and virtualization purposes.
Nix: Mentioned for its unique package management approach.
Kali Linux: Chosen for testing and research.
Raspberry Pi OS: Ideal for Raspberry Pi-based projects and systems.
It's important to choose a distribution that aligns with your specific use case and preferences. Each distribution has its own strengths and weaknesses, so it's worthwhile to explore and experiment with different ones to find the best fit for your needs.
In your opinion, what emerging IT trends or technologies show the most promise in the next three to five years?
In the coming three to five years, several promising IT trends and technologies are emerging:
Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI is a prominent trend, with applications in various fields such as natural language processing and machine learning. However, some are concerned about privacy issues associated with certain AI technologies.
Advanced Connectivity (5G Networks): The deployment of 5G networks is expected to revolutionize connectivity and enable faster data transmission, benefiting various sectors.
Web3: The transition to Web3, which is expected to enhance decentralized and blockchain-based internet services, is gaining attention. Trust Architectures: Technologies focused on trust and security, such as digital identity and secure architectures, are expected to play a crucial role in the coming years.
Containerization: Container technologies and solutions, like Docker and Kubernetes, are being increasingly adopted for software deployment and management.
Immutable Systems: Immutable operating systems and file systems are gaining popularity for their ability to enhance system stability and security.
AI-Driven Game Development (e.g., Godot): AI is becoming integral in game development, automating various aspects of game design and rendering.
WebAssembly: The use of WebAssembly for applications, system tuning, and system enhancements is on the rise. Security: Security is expected to remain a top concern, especially with the increasing use of cloud services and the need to protect sensitive data.
Open Source and FOSS Adoption: There is a growing trend toward using open-source software and Linux-based solutions, focusing on transparency and control over data.
Sustainability and Green IT: Sustainability and environmentally friendly technologies are becoming more significant as the IT industry explores eco-friendly solutions.
Desktop Linux and Gaming: Desktop Linux is expected to gain more popularity, especially in the gaming sector, with trends like the Steam Deck driving its adoption.
Generative AI: Generative AI technologies, like language models and image generation tools, are likely to have a growing impact in various domains.
Quantum Computing: Quantum computing may become more accessible and find applications, particularly in cryptography and complex problem-solving.
Edge Computing: Edge computing, which involves processing data closer to the source, is gaining importance, especially for IoT and autonomous systems.
Data Analysis: The field of data analysis and analytics is expected to expand further, providing valuable insights for various industries. Rust Programming Language: The Rust programming language is gaining popularity for its safety and performance, contributing to software development tools.
Digital Twins: The integration of multiple systems into digital twins is expected to advance, offering enhanced simulations and modeling.
Augmented and Virtual Reality (AR/VR): AR and VR technologies are expected to evolve and find applications in various sectors.
Machine Learning (LLM): Machine learning, particularly large language models (LLMs), is advancing rapidly and is likely to impact various aspects of computing.
It's important to note that these trends may vary in significance based on the specific industry or field of interest. Additionally, privacy and security concerns, as well as environmental considerations, will continue to shape the development and adoption of emerging technologies.
Do you believe Linux is well-positioned to meet the evolving needs of the market, including emerging technologies? Please explain.
Linux is well-positioned to meet the evolving needs of the market, especially in emerging technologies. Many comments in favor of Linux mention its stability, high performance, system administration capabilities, and open nature. It's widely used in server technologies, with a growing market share, and its versatility, openness, and flexibility make it suitable for various applications. Linux's popularity is increasing, with more support for open platforms and the adoption of emerging technologies.
On the other hand, some comments express concerns about Linux's position, primarily in the desktop market. They mention issues related to the user experience and the absence of specific applications for end users, making it less competitive with commercial operating systems. However, there is hope that devices like the Steam Deck and increasing support for various technologies will improve Linux's position on the desktop.
In summary, Linux's adaptability, open-source nature, and presence in the server and cloud markets make it well-suited to meet the evolving needs of the market, but there are challenges in expanding its desktop market share and improving user-friendliness.
Are there any specific features or improvements you would like to see in Linux distributions to better support your use case(s)?
The responses to the question about specific features or improvements desired in Linux distributions vary widely. Here's a summary of the key points:
Professional Apps: Many respondents express the need for professional-grade applications on Linux. The lack of such software is seen as one of Linux's biggest challenges.
Continuous Improvement: Some respondents believe that the open-source community is continually improving software packages, indicating satisfaction with the direction Linux is taking.
User Assistance and Support: There's a call for better post-installation support, guidance on configuration optimization, and integration of AI-driven assistance.
Contentment: Several users express their satisfaction with Linux, acknowledging its role in enabling their scientific achievements and revolutionary impact.
Security and Encryption: Improved security features like systemd-homed, LUKS, TPM, and FIDO support are desired. Also, better integration of secure boot and device onboarding.
Better Color Management: Enhanced color management, particularly in Wayland, is requested.
Desktop Environment Switching: Users want more flexibility to switch between desktop environments without system-wide changes and advocate for declarative configuration.
User-Friendly Permissions: Requests for simplified administration, like adding printers or editing files as admin via GUI editors without needing root access, are highlighted.
Technical Compatibility: Improved compatibility with other Linux distributions, particularly Red Hat-based systems, in terms of package naming and structures, is desired.
Tumbleweed and SlowRolls Relationship: Users appreciate the relationship between Tumbleweed and SlowRolls and hope to see similar cooperation among other distributions.
Graphics and GPU Support: Enhanced support for graphics card settings and improved Intel Atom graphics drivers are mentioned.
Virtualization: Better virtualization support for running OS/2 on KVM is requested.
Remote Management Tools: Some users would like to see tooling for remote management and long-running, well-documented transactional distributions.
Aesthetics: Aesthetically pleasing desktop environments and improved marketing are suggested for openSUSE.
Debugging and Simplification: Users call for better debugging tools, enhanced organization, reduced duplicity, and increased simplicity.
Power Management: Improved power management and better support for ARM64 platforms are mentioned.
Finance and Desktop Distribution: Some users believe that Linux companies should take finance platforms more seriously and develop desktop distributions accordingly.
Appealing Desktop Environments: Better desktop environments that are welcoming to newcomers not well-versed in the command line are desired.
Tumbleweed Defaults: Users hope for better default configurations in Tumbleweed.
Concerns about the Future: Some express concerns about the direction of openSUSE, particularly related to changes like the termination of Leap and a shift towards microservices and containerization.
Package Management: A desire for more straightforward package management and simplicity with a focus on immutability is mentioned.
Hardware Support: Better support for newer hardware, including graphics cards, graphic tablets, and touchscreens, is requested. HDR Support: Improved HDR support is desired.
Linux on IoT Devices: Users emphasize the importance of free, open, stable distributions for developing IoT products.
Linux for Artists: Better support for graphic tablets and artistic tools is mentioned.
User-Friendly Updates: Users call for a more user-friendly approach to handling system updates.
Version Management: Users want easier management of components with multiple versions.
Ease of Use: Simplicity, ease of use, and an easier entry point for new users are recurring themes.
Documentation: There's a call for better documentation and information about how to install the OS.
Security Configuration: Simplifying the configuration of security measures like firewalls and AppArmor is requested.
PHP Version Management: Some users express the need for easier management of PHP versions.
Driver Management: Better driver management, particularly for video cards, is desired.
Containerization: Users express concerns about the growing complexity due to container-based solutions and their impact on the average desktop user.
Init System: Some users want alternatives to the systemd init system.
Wayland and HDR Support: Better Wayland support and HDR capabilities are desired.
Windows Compatibility: Users hope for better compatibility with Windows applications, particularly for proprietary software.
Update Management: Easier management of updates, including improved management of multiple versions of software components, is requested.
File Management: Users want better drag and drop functionality for files.
Repository Management: Easier management of software repositories is requested.
NAS Distribution: Some users would like to see an openSUSE-based NAS distribution.
openSUSE Repositories: Requests for more packages in openSUSE repositories and a ports system like Arch's AUR are made.
KDE Support: Users ask for continued support for KDE on openSUSE Tumbleweed.
Server and Desktop Needs: Users emphasize the importance of different distributions for server and desktop needs, with specific stability requirements.
Graphics Support: Better graphics support, including improved drivers for older and new hardware, is desired. Improved Desktop Experience: Users express the need for an improved desktop experience, including support for peripherals and reducing complications.
LSB Standardization: Some users call for standardizing on the Linux Standard Base (LSB) for easier application development. Focusing on Support: OpenSUSE is urged to focus on offering support through books, training, and knowledge sharing.
Geoinformatics Tools: Users express a need for better tools for geoinformatics on openSUSE.
Electron App Rendering: Users are frustrated with how Electron-based applications render on Wayland compositors.
Marketing and Awareness: Better marketing and efforts to increase Linux adoption and awareness are suggested. Please note that the variety of responses reflects the diverse needs and expectations of Linux users across different use cases.
Would you recommend Linux to others in your industry for the use cases you've explored? Why or why not?
The comments reflect a wide range of opinions regarding recommending Linux in various industries and use cases. Some key points that emerge from these comments are:
Server Workloads: Linux is highly recommended for server workloads. It is praised for its stability, performance, and its ability to ease the management of distributed computing instances. It is seen as the best option for these scenarios, with no real alternatives.
Development and Privacy: Many people recommend Linux for development purposes, highlighting its flexibility, openness, and privacy features. It's viewed as a superior platform for coding and learning new things.
Customization and Freedom: Linux is praised for its customizability and the freedom it provides to users. It's seen as a system that lets you have more control and tailor it to your specific needs.
Cost Savings: Some recommend Linux because it's free and open source, which can save money compared to proprietary alternatives like Windows. Security: Security-conscious users appreciate Linux for its robust security features.
Mixed Recommendations: Some express hesitation about recommending Linux for certain use cases. They point out that Linux might not be suitable for everyone and that there can be limitations, especially in environments that rely heavily on proprietary software.
Challenges with Gaming and Compatibility: Gaming is mentioned as a challenge, but there's optimism about Linux's future in this area due to the improvement of tools like Proton.
Specific Use Cases: Recommendations vary depending on the use cases and the specific requirements of the industry. Some industries might be more receptive to Linux than others.
Learning Curve: The comments highlight the need for users to be somewhat tech-savvy and willing to adapt to a different operating system. Support and Knowledge: The availability of Linux expertise and support is mentioned as a critical factor when recommending it.
In summary, Linux is highly recommended for server workloads, development, and privacy-conscious users. However, the suitability of Linux for a particular industry or use case often depends on factors like software compatibility, user expertise, and the willingness to adapt to a different operating system.