AttrakDiff
From openSUSE
| Revision as of 11:12, 21 August 2008 Nefuchs (Talk | contribs) � Previous diff |
Current revision Fsundermeyer (Talk | contribs) Content check |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| How does the user judge the global attractiveness | How does the user judge the global attractiveness | ||
| of the product<br> | of the product<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Contentcheck|[[User:Fsundermeyer|Fsundermeyer]] 14:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)}} | ||
Current revision
Contents |
General
With this method of evaluation both the recognized pragmatic quality as well as the hedonic quality of an interactive product can be assessed. AttrakDiff was applied as an instrument of measurement in the format of semantic differentials. It consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. "confusing - clear", "unusual - ordinary", "good - bad"). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the middle values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality, hedonic quality in terms of stimulation, hedonic quality in terms of identification and attractiveness.
Pragmatic Quality
Utility character of a product, how good can user achieve his goals?
Hedonic Quality – Stimulation
Does the software provide new,interesting, and motivating content?
Hedonic Quality – Identification
Can the user identify himself with the product?
Attractiveness
How does the user judge the global attractiveness
of the product
Passed QA check: Fsundermeyer 14:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
This site uses the YAML CSS framework.
About openSUSE | Disclaimers | Feedback
This page was last modified 14:47, 16 June 2009. This page has been accessed 585 times.
