Meetings/Status Meeting 2007-04-25
From openSUSE
< Meetings
| Meetings
|
This meeting is meant to discuss the latest developments in and around openSUSE.
It was held in the #openSUSE-project Freenode IRC channel on
Wednesday 2007/04/25 18:00 CEST (16:00 GMT)
Contents |
[edit]
Agenda
[edit]
Status
[edit]
Distribution
- roadmap, feature list and media layout progress?
[edit]
Communication
[edit]
Buildservice
[edit]
Events
- LinuxTag
[edit]
Q & A (see questions below)
[edit]
Q&A Section
| Your Name | Question/Comment |
|---|---|
| Dunes | Why has the current 10.3 branding not the official chameleon? Imho it should be used instead of the current unknown hybrid. This to make system look and feel over-all recognizable as the SUSE distribution. |
| Gabriel | I don't know what plans do you have for the gnome menu, but I think it should be more customizable. Maybe letting the user change the groups of the application browser, or drag applications to other group, etc. |
| mesmero | Is there a chance to put WTF (from the suser-crauch repository) and yakuake, two useful and small apps, into the next openSUSE distribution? |
| Kevin | I noticed there was a mock up in Branding for 10.3 for a new, really good looking installer. Will this be implemented in 10.3? It looks way better than the current one! |
| Marc | I noticed after tried many distribution: mandriva, kheops, fedora, xandros, ubuntu, suse that suse is very nice but lack of the performance side: slow boot time, yast is slow, system is not enough responsive. We can read on many forum this problem. What the opensuse team will do to improve that? |
| RedDwarf | We will see NTFS-3G integrated (default driver, YaST, etc.) in openSUSE 10.3? In bug #247750 was discussed how it should be added *if* added, but we still don't know if it will be added or no. |
| Scott Couston | It seems apparent from the number bugs without a resolution still exist in versions 10,0-10,2. A very small number of bugs are closed as Fixed in 10,3. Looking at the sheer number of open bugs in 10,0-10,2 it would appear that release of a new version only increases functionality at the expense of closing and fixing bugs. Can you tell me/us under what situation/timetable you use to determine the tooling-up for a new version and what constitutes a RC - given the number of current bugs. Forgive me I am not offering criticism at all, however Novel's Q.A compliance would appear at odds with current release pattern of aprox 6 months. Due to my GMT +10 time difference I will be unable to attend the session and trust that a .PDF may be available afterwards. Many Thanks for your time. |
| Christian Boltz | What's the status of public FATE? (AI #223290, no feedback since november) |
[edit]

