KDE/Meetings/2008 04 30-transcript
From openSUSE
[20:04:24] Emne dirk sætter kanalemnet til "Welcome to the openSUSE KDE Team meeting!". [20:04:36] <dirk> * old action items [20:04:40] <dirk> * status [20:04:57] <dirk> * artwork stuff (Seli's topic if he's around) [20:04:59] <dirk> * misc [20:05:57] <dirk> anything else? [20:06:21] <rabauke> *misc is everything else, is it not? [20:06:30] <wstephenson> '.*' [20:06:45] <dirk> rabauke: everything not worth a topic on its own :) [20:06:48] <dirk> okay, I guess not.. [20:06:50] <dirk> soo.. [20:07:00] <dirk> http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/Meetings/20080416 [20:07:06] <dirk> * Improve kde building guide (bille) [20:07:19] <rabauke> functionality from kde3 that is still missing in kde4 is my misc. :) [20:07:26] <wstephenson> dirk: done, finally [20:07:35] <wstephenson> has anyone used it? [20:07:37] <dirk> wstephenson: mention the url, perhaps? [20:07:49] <wstephenson> rabauke: there are some scripts that might help you [20:07:54] <dirk> wstephenson: there were people complaining that it mentions akonadi package, which doesn't exist iirc [20:08:09] <wstephenson> http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3403 [20:08:16] <wstephenson> ok [20:08:17] <rabauke> wstephenson: for me kde trunk never finds "samba" although those packages are installed. [20:08:34] <wstephenson> rabauke: on factory? [20:08:37] <Beineri> it was also mentioned in openSUSE Weekly News [20:08:48] <rabauke> wstephenson: 10.3 [20:08:56] <wstephenson> ok, i'll check that. [20:09:48] <dirk> rabauke: libsmbclient-devel installed? [20:09:54] <rabauke> dirk: yes [20:10:06] <dirk> * add packaging guideline for kde4 packages [20:10:33] <dirk> rabauke: you can inspire yourself from KDE:KDE4:UNSTABLE:Desktop/kdebase4/kdebase4.spec, section buildrequires [20:10:51] <rabauke> libsmbclient-devel-3.0.26a-3.5 and I also tried to delete the CMAkeCache [20:11:17] <dirk> has anyone spent time on writing updating the packaging cookbook for kde4? [20:12:02] <wstephenson> no [20:12:12] <dirk> I've written a rpmlint checker for getting the library package dependencies right [20:12:31] <dirk> I submitted it too late though, so we'll not see results before next week [20:12:54] <dirk> it needs some additions for akonadi, but that is yet to be sorted out [20:13:08] <dirk> * talk to zonker/announce bug day (beineri) [20:13:41] <Beineri> well, did not happen. watched the yast bug day a bit and participation wasn't that good mo [20:13:59] <Beineri> dunno if it makes sense for kde to have one now... [20:14:24] <dirk> I didn't follow it.. what ws the goal of the yast2 bug day? [20:14:25] <Beineri> makes imo most sense some time going through old kde3 bugs if they still apply to kde4 and afterwards close all others [20:14:38] <Beineri> dirk: cleaning old yast bugs of 10.x [20:14:53] <dirk> I would think it is a good idea to tag bugs that we should fix for 11.0, and get rid of others.. to make sure that everyone knows what needs to be done [20:14:55] <Beineri> tested against Beta 1 [20:15:02] <dirk> our current > 300 open bugreports is too much to keep track [20:15:33] <wstephenson> good idea [20:15:39] * Beineri thinks from the current KDE4 bug reports most are still valid, so only screening the larger amount of kde3 bugs makes sense [20:15:52] <dirk> I agree [20:16:08] <dirk> I've also not found many bugreports where upgrading to 4.1 codebase would fix anything [20:16:12] <Beineri> the question is, against what version to test - must that be pre-release? [20:17:50] <dirk> I don't get the question [20:18:03] <dirk> you mean we should do the kde3 bugscreening after 11.0 goldmaster? [20:19:40] * dirk assumes that Beineri is offline and continues.. [20:19:50] <dirk> * announce new round of kdepim packages (bille) [20:19:52] <rabauke> sheep alarm! [20:19:53] <wstephenson> maybe he went into a tunnel [20:20:04] <wstephenson> TBD, i'll do that tomorrow. [20:20:26] <wstephenson> i f'ing hate firefox's close-widget-on-tabs, can that be changed? [20:20:26] <dirk> which packages do you want to announce then? :) the current ones fail to build again ;( [20:20:35] <wstephenson> i'll fix them then announce them then. [20:20:41] <dirk> * backport spellchecker stuff for kdepim41 (llunak) [20:20:43] * wstephenson reopens RPM [20:20:46] <wstephenson> RTM [20:22:13] <dirk> afaik lubos was busy with other stuff, and it seems nobody missed spellchecking in kmail yet [20:22:25] <dirk> I guess it goes in line with the other bugreport about spellchecking being entirely broken anyway [20:22:36] <dirk> * wiki page for KDE4 testing (bille) [20:22:43] <wstephenson> not done yet [20:22:50] <wstephenson> maybe this weekend... [20:22:55] <dirk> * status [20:23:28] <dirk> quite some fixes missed beta2, so it will again not be as usable as it could be [20:23:41] <rabauke> I miss sonnet... [20:23:50] <dirk> I would like to recomment to anyone to add the KDE:KDE4:STABLE:Desktop repository [20:23:58] <dirk> and update from that [20:24:11] <rabauke> does the installer of the live cd work? [20:24:32] <dirk> as far as I know it doesn't, but there is still a day left ;) [20:24:40] <dirk> well, it does except for a few cases [20:24:53] <dirk> checkin deadline was monday, they spent the whole week on trying to get something [20:25:14] <dirk> there were ~ 860 checkins for beta2 [20:25:45] <dirk> ~ 140 kde [20:25:58] <dirk> Beineri did quite some last-minute version updates [20:26:59] <dirk> and fixed ~ 20 bugreports against plasma for beta2 [20:28:07] <dirk> incoming bugrate is bigger than bug-fixing rate though [20:29:18] <wstephenson> any more status? [20:29:38] <dirk> anything you might want to add? :) [20:30:06] <dirk> Beineri: [20:30:11] <wstephenson> uh, akonadi is split out of kde core for cross-desktop-ability (maybe someone didn't know that) [20:30:27] <dirk> [20:16] <Beineri> the question is, against what version to test - must that be pre-release? [20:30:27] <dirk> [20:17] <dirk> I don't get the question [20:30:27] <dirk> [20:18] <dirk> you mean we should do the kde3 bugscreening after 11.0 goldmaster? [20:30:46] <Beineri> dirk: yeah [20:31:09] <dirk> Beineri: well, I don't really want to do online updates for 11.0 and kde3 unless I have to :) [20:31:13] <dirk> Beineri: but you're right.. [20:31:14] <Beineri> small status about desktop selection in beta2:[20:31:44] <yaloki> Beineri: thanks for the screenshot [20:32:01] <wstephenson> i even like the distinction between the two kde icons now. [20:32:12] <rabauke> looks better [20:32:16] <yaloki> yep [20:32:37] <Beineri> and the last two are the branding for kdm and the splash, the desktop didn't change from Beta 1 :-) [20:33:16] <Beineri> the look didn't change, of course many bugs are gone! [20:34:43] <Beineri> next point (or am I lost again)? [20:34:51] <rabauke> not lost [20:34:58] <yaloki> we definitely have the sexiest installer ^^ [20:35:00] <dirk> I'm thinking: should we discuss the artwork issue [20:35:27] <dirk> seli brought this up yesterday.. he was thinking that the window demandsattention notification looks really bad [20:35:27] <rabauke> you mean the colour for the windeco? [20:35:45] <dirk> the aya theme seems to have introduced it.. it is essentially invisible now [20:35:48] <wstephenson> taskbar flash in plasma? [20:35:52] <dirk> the question was how should we fix it [20:36:04] <rabauke> make it red [20:36:15] <dirk> make a smooth blending animation (like e.g. that other desktop :) ) or something else.. ? [20:36:17] <Beineri> look how "default" does it and copy that part to aya? :-) [20:36:35] <dirk> Beineri: default highlights, thats why it can't be seen ;) [20:36:52] <dirk> rabauke: why? it should still be unintrusive [20:37:08] <dirk> anyway, as he isn't here, I don't really know his suggestion [20:37:14] <rabauke> you mean tasks, right? [20:37:40] <dirk> rabauke: yep.. whenever a window requires input for example, or has something interesting to show (e.g. new message in kopete) [20:38:00] <dirk> or konversation and somebody is talking to you [20:38:38] <rabauke> if not the default plasma theme, there is one that has a redish shine on those that demand attention. if you look at the default plasma theme's active white shade, that shade in red should not be that bad. [20:38:49] <rabauke> not compared to the blue of the windeco anyway. [20:39:13] <lontra> Beineri: when you had the hp mini-note were you able to adjust brightness? [20:39:24] <wstephenson> lontra: /topic [20:39:52] <lontra> wstephenson: sorry ... i didn't it in the wrong channel again .. [20:40:13] <dirk> rabauke: what do you dislike about the blue? :) [20:40:43] <rabauke> I like blue! [20:40:58] <rabauke> if it fits [20:40:58] <wstephenson> i think demandsattention should turn the taskbar entry the same colour as the active window border. [20:41:02] <lontra> might i add that the kdm4 userlist default icon is uber ugly in 11.0 [20:41:41] * rabauke gives a ü to lontra [20:43:32] <rabauke> next [20:43:42] <dirk> * misc [20:43:53] <dirk> lontra: isn't it the same as with kde3? [20:43:58] <dirk> lontra: is there a better one? [20:44:53] * dirk boots a 10.3 [20:45:03] <lontra> dirk: maybe it's the same ... i just have kde4 installed on 11 but it's different than the 10.3 userlist icon ...which is much nicer [20:45:15] <rabauke> how important do you think it is to have the mount-options for removeable devices in kde4? [20:45:52] <dirk> lontra: if its different from the kde3 one then thats definitely a bug [20:46:07] <rabauke> you mean that grey head? [20:46:13] <dirk> yep [20:46:29] <wstephenson> rabauke: are you talking about the bug to choose what to do on mounting a device? [20:46:38] <rabauke> I never understood why it is still used, it surely does look ugly. [20:46:49] <rabauke> wstephenson: yes [20:46:52] <dirk> rabauke: is there a better one? [20:47:14] <rabauke> dirk: I'll search one and if not, request one at #oxygen [20:47:51] <lontra> dirk: yeah it's different than 10.3 for sure ... it's the ugly kubuntu uses [20:48:14] <dirk>
[20:48:27] <dirk> thats how it should look like [20:48:28] <dirk> everything else is a bug [20:48:38] <lontra> oh ... that's different than 10.3 [20:49:16] <lontra> that's what it looks like here but it's pretty ugly compared with the rest of the beautiful artwork [20:49:36] <wstephenson> allegedly that's what ken wimer looks like, without the makeup ;) [20:49:57] <dirk> lontra: okay [20:50:30] <dirk> lontra: share your concerns in https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=369319 [20:50:34] <bugbot> openSUSE bug 369319 in openSUSE 11.0 (KDE4 Workspace) "create KDM theme for 11.0" [Major,Reopened] [20:50:53] <rabauke> yast-files looks better [20:50:54] <dirk> anything else? [20:51:11] <rabauke> or syste-users [20:51:15] <rabauke> system-users [20:51:19] <lontra> dirk: thanks [20:51:40] * mrdocs wanders in late and waves [20:51:53] <mrdocs> qestion time yet ? [20:52:03] <dirk> yes [20:52:07] <rabauke> I'm sure they can give you a "preferneces-desktop-user" without the extra bit too. [20:52:18] <dirk> rabauke: hmm, I like yast-files, but system-users doesn't match the other artwork imho [20:52:32] <rabauke> they are oxygen [20:53:02] <mrdocs> my only question is what can we beat up that needs or will need testing ? :) [20:53:06] <dirk> preferences-desktop-user looks nice [20:53:32] <dirk> my vote would be on that [20:53:45] * dirk hopes that the extra blue button is a layer that can be removed..) [20:53:45] <rabauke> without that "!" though. [20:54:28] <dirk> I guess what you're really asking for is integrated webcam support and taking a snapshot of the user as he types his password ;) [20:55:03] <rabauke> that would be something really nifty! almost PS3 style. [20:55:10] <rabauke> btw: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=377565 [20:55:12] <rabauke> fixed [20:55:13] <bugbot> openSUSE bug 377565 in openSUSE 11.0 (Kernel) "Kernel freeze with live CD" [Blocker,Resolved: fixed] [20:55:19] <dirk> mrdocs: any app that we ship and is in the all of kde selection: check if they still start up.. crash or have other obvious errors [20:55:33] <mrdocs> dirk: ok then [20:55:47] <dirk> mrdocs: wstephenson is doing the QA job assignments ;) [20:55:57] <rabauke> ah, I have a question. How should/can I test the "move kde3 settings to kde4" or is there no such feature? [20:56:12] <dirk> mrdocs: I guess we should do that on irc on a specific day or so [20:56:26] <dirk> rabauke: launch kde4-migrate, but it is not ready for testing yet [20:56:33] <dirk> beta3 [20:56:36] <rabauke> so I won't launch it ;) [20:56:41] <wstephenson> dirk: what i really want for 4.2 is a Wii/Mii style avatar system. [20:56:49] * lontra apologize for the pun he just made on the kdm theme bug report [20:56:51] <dirk> rabauke: it doesn't hurt, it just doesn't do anything :) [20:56:59] <mrdocs> is lack of OSD with konversation on kde4 a known bug ? [20:57:08] <dirk> mrdocs: already fixed [20:57:20] <mrdocs> in factory ? kde 4.1 ? [20:57:26] <dirk> konversation in factory [20:57:31] <dirk> I think it missed beta2 checkin though [20:57:35] <dirk> I submitted it last friday [20:57:46] <dirk> ah, no, it is in [20:58:37] * dirk doesn't really think that a ~ 2.5 year old konversation snapshot is a good default package but he's not the pckage maintainer [20:58:47] <dirk> there is a new one in KDE:Playground [20:58:56] <mrdocs> hmm [20:59:58] <dirk> okay, anyone has a calendar open? two weeks is May 13th, right? [21:00:14] <wstephenson> 14th [21:00:37] <dirk> okay.. see ya.. have a nice weekend :) [21:00:38] <wstephenson> i'm about to go, unless anyone needs me [21:00:42] <wstephenson> bye, you too. [21:01:12] Emne dirk sætter kanalemnet til "The channel for the KDE community in openSUSE | Next meeting: May 14th, 18:00 UTC | http://opensuse.org/KDE4 | http://opensuse.org/KDE/Upgrade | http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-kde/".

[20:31:44] <yaloki> Beineri: thanks for the screenshot
[20:32:01] <wstephenson> i even like the distinction between the two kde icons now.
[20:32:12] <rabauke> looks better
[20:32:16] <yaloki> yep
[20:32:37] <Beineri> and the last two are the branding for kdm and the splash, the desktop didn't change from Beta 1 :-)
[20:33:16] <Beineri> the look didn't change, of course many bugs are gone!
[20:34:43] <Beineri> next point (or am I lost again)?
[20:34:51] <rabauke> not lost
[20:34:58] <yaloki> we definitely have the sexiest installer ^^
[20:35:00] <dirk> I'm thinking: should we discuss the artwork issue
[20:35:27] <dirk> seli brought this up yesterday.. he was thinking that the window demandsattention notification looks really bad
[20:35:27] <rabauke> you mean the colour for the windeco?
[20:35:45] <dirk> the aya theme seems to have introduced it.. it is essentially invisible now
[20:35:48] <wstephenson> taskbar flash in plasma?
[20:35:52] <dirk> the question was how should we fix it
[20:36:04] <rabauke> make it red
[20:36:15] <dirk> make a smooth blending animation (like e.g. that other desktop :) ) or something else.. ?
[20:36:17] <Beineri> look how "default" does it and copy that part to aya? :-)
[20:36:35] <dirk> Beineri: default highlights, thats why it can't be seen ;)
[20:36:52] <dirk> rabauke: why? it should still be unintrusive
[20:37:08] <dirk> anyway, as he isn't here, I don't really know his suggestion
[20:37:14] <rabauke> you mean tasks, right?
[20:37:40] <dirk> rabauke: yep.. whenever a window requires input for example, or has something interesting to show (e.g. new message in kopete)
[20:38:00] <dirk> or konversation and somebody is talking to you
[20:38:38] <rabauke> if not the default plasma theme, there is one that has a redish shine on those that demand attention. if you look at the default plasma theme's active white shade, that shade in red should not be that bad.
[20:38:49] <rabauke> not compared to the blue of the windeco anyway.
[20:39:13] <lontra> Beineri: when you had the hp mini-note were you able to adjust brightness?
[20:39:24] <wstephenson> lontra: /topic
[20:39:52] <lontra> wstephenson: sorry ... i didn't it in the wrong channel again ..
[20:40:13] <dirk> rabauke: what do you dislike about the blue? :)
[20:40:43] <rabauke> I like blue!
[20:40:58] <rabauke> if it fits
[20:40:58] <wstephenson> i think demandsattention should turn the taskbar entry the same colour as the active window border.
[20:41:02] <lontra> might i add that the kdm4 userlist default icon is uber ugly in 11.0
[20:41:41] * rabauke gives a ü to lontra
[20:43:32] <rabauke> next
[20:43:42] <dirk> * misc
[20:43:53] <dirk> lontra: isn't it the same as with kde3?
[20:43:58] <dirk> lontra: is there a better one?
[20:44:53] * dirk boots a 10.3
[20:45:03] <lontra> dirk: maybe it's the same ... i just have kde4 installed on 11 but it's different than the 10.3 userlist icon ...which is much nicer
[20:45:15] <rabauke> how important do you think it is to have the mount-options for removeable devices in kde4?
[20:45:52] <dirk> lontra: if its different from the kde3 one then thats definitely a bug
[20:46:07] <rabauke> you mean that grey head?
[20:46:13] <dirk> yep
[20:46:29] <wstephenson> rabauke: are you talking about the bug to choose what to do on mounting a device?
[20:46:38] <rabauke> I never understood why it is still used, it surely does look ugly.
[20:46:49] <rabauke> wstephenson: yes
[20:46:52] <dirk> rabauke: is there a better one?
[20:47:14] <rabauke> dirk: I'll search one and if not, request one at #oxygen
[20:47:51] <lontra> dirk: yeah it's different than 10.3 for sure ... it's the ugly kubuntu uses
[20:48:14] <dirk>
[20:48:27] <dirk> thats how it should look like
[20:48:28] <dirk> everything else is a bug
[20:48:38] <lontra> oh ... that's different than 10.3
[20:49:16] <lontra> that's what it looks like here but it's pretty ugly compared with the rest of the beautiful artwork
[20:49:36] <wstephenson> allegedly that's what ken wimer looks like, without the makeup ;)
[20:49:57] <dirk> lontra: okay
[20:50:30] <dirk> lontra: share your concerns in 